Artificial Intelligence and human everyday life


The world of work has seen many transformations over the past century. From industrial revolutions to the rise of the digital age, economic changes have always had a significant impact on the workforce. However, we are now facing a new era—the age of Artificial Intelligence (AI)—which is not just changing the way businesses operate but is also profoundly altering the structure of the labor market. One of the most pressing concerns is how job loss is perceived when it is driven not by economic downturns or corporate restructuring, but by the automation of tasks traditionally performed by humans. This post reflects on how job loss is viewed in the context of AI, particularly distinguishing between downsizing due to economic pressures versus job displacement caused by AI-driven automation.
The Psychological Impact of Job Loss
Job loss, in general, is a traumatic event that can lead to a wide range of emotional and psychological responses. Research in occupational psychology has shown that the impact of unemployment can vary based on factors such as the individual’s coping strategies, the reason for job loss, and the perceived fairness of the process. When workers lose their jobs due to downsizing or restructuring—common during economic recessions or corporate shifts—they often face a sense of injustice, insecurity, and loss of social status. However, when AI displaces workers, the psychological effects can be even more complex.
Downsizing vs. Automation: The Key Differences
At first glance, both downsizing and automation may seem like just different forms of job loss. However, when we delve into the underlying causes and psychological consequences, we can observe critical differences. Downsizing, or the elimination of jobs due to economic pressures or organizational changes, is typically framed as a decision made by the employer to improve financial performance or adapt to market conditions. On the other hand, job displacement due to AI involves the direct replacement of human labor with technology, a phenomenon that feels more impersonal and often outside of an individual’s control.
1. Downsizing: The Economic Reality of Job Loss
Downsizing, in the traditional sense, is an event in which businesses reduce their workforce to cope with economic challenges, such as recessions, market competition, or declining profitability. The decision to downsize often involves cutting costs, streamlining operations, or reorganizing departments. For the worker, this kind of job loss may be seen as a part of larger economic forces, where personal inadequacy is not perceived as a central cause. Although this does not minimize the emotional pain of being laid off, many workers can rationalize that it is simply a result of macroeconomic conditions.
Psychologically, workers affected by downsizing may experience anxiety, depression, and a sense of helplessness. According to the Conservation of Resources (COR) Theory by Hobfoll (1989), individuals strive to protect and build resources such as employment, status, and financial stability. Losing these resources can lead to a sense of loss and stress. However, workers may also experience a sense of resilience if they are able to frame the job loss as a temporary setback or a challenge to overcome.
Coping with Downsizing:
- Social Support: Those who have strong support networks tend to fare better emotionally after downsizing. According to Social Support Theory (Cohen & Wills, 1985), emotional support from family, friends, and peers can mitigate stress and promote adaptive coping mechanisms.
- Perceived Control: The Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) Model by Demerouti and Bakker (2001) suggests that employees who perceive they have more control over their job loss experience less stress. Those who feel powerless may be more susceptible to mental health issues.
2. Automation and AI: A New Era of Job Loss
In contrast to the traditional economic rationale for downsizing, the rise of AI and automation represents a more existential threat to certain professions. Tasks once performed by humans are now being carried out by machines capable of processing vast amounts of data, learning from patterns, and executing complex tasks with minimal human intervention. Jobs in industries such as manufacturing, customer service, and even knowledge-based sectors like finance and law are being replaced by algorithms and AI systems. This shift leads to a new form of job loss: one that feels less like a result of external economic forces and more like a personal obsolescence.
The psychological effects of AI-driven job loss are profoundly different from those caused by downsizing. Automation introduces a unique element—dehumanization. Workers who are displaced by AI may feel as though they have been replaced by an impersonal force, a machine, that doesn’t require rest, pay, or empathy. This lack of personal agency in the process can be demoralizing, causing individuals to question their worth, skills, and even their relevance in society.
Automation and the Fear of Irrelevance:
- Existential Threat: AI-driven job loss can trigger an existential crisis, where workers question their place in the world. The fear of being replaced by machines is not just about losing a paycheck but about losing a sense of identity. According to Self-Determination Theory (Deci & Ryan, 2000), people have an intrinsic need for competence, autonomy, and relatedness. Automation, which undermines human competency in certain tasks, can create feelings of incompetence and a loss of agency.
- Identity Disruption: Work often forms a significant part of an individual’s self-concept. Social Identity Theory (Tajfel & Turner, 1986) highlights how group memberships, such as occupational roles, are integral to one's self-esteem and social identity. When AI displaces a job, it can sever this connection, leading to a crisis of identity and self-worth.
The Role of Technology and Cognitive Dissonance
One of the key psychological processes at play when dealing with AI-induced job loss is cognitive dissonance. Workers may experience a sense of dissonance between their beliefs about the future of work (e.g., the idea that technology should improve human life) and the reality of job displacement. The Theory of Cognitive Dissonance (Festinger, 1957) posits that people strive for internal consistency. When confronted with the reality of AI replacing human labor, individuals may experience discomfort and attempt to resolve this dissonance by either accepting the inevitable shift or resisting it through denial or deflection. For some, adapting to the rise of AI requires significant changes in mindset, skill acquisition, and the redefinition of work.
3. Coping Mechanisms for AI-induced Job Loss
When it comes to AI and automation, coping mechanisms are even more crucial. While workers who face traditional downsizing may seek new employment or start new careers, AI-induced job loss may require a more nuanced approach.
- Upskilling and Reskilling: The rise of automation also presents opportunities for workers to reinvent themselves. Resilience theories suggest that the ability to adapt and acquire new skills is central to overcoming job displacement. Programs aimed at reskilling the workforce are essential in mitigating the impact of AI on job loss.
- Psychological Flexibility: According to Psychological Flexibility Theory (Hayes et al., 2006), individuals who are able to accept the changing nature of the workplace and remain flexible in their job expectations are more likely to maintain psychological well-being. This may involve changing careers, embracing lifelong learning, or adopting entrepreneurial ventures.
Conclusion: Navigating the Psychological Terrain of AI and Job Loss
The psychological effects of job loss—whether due to downsizing or automation—are profound and far-reaching. While economic factors influencing downsizing are often easier to frame within the context of macroeconomic forces, the rise of AI presents a unique challenge. AI-induced job loss feels less like an economic reality and more like a personal obsolescence, leading to existential crises and identity disruptions. The psychological theories we’ve explored, from Social Identity Theory to Self-Determination Theory, offer valuable insights into how individuals respond to these changes.
Ultimately, the rise of AI offers both challenges and opportunities. As businesses adopt AI technologies to streamline processes, workers must also adapt to a rapidly changing landscape. Support systems, upskilling programs, and a focus on psychological flexibility will be critical in ensuring that workers are not only prepared for these changes but can thrive in the face of them. The future of work in the AI age may be uncertain, but with the right resources, individuals can navigate this new terrain with resilience and agency.
Book Review: "Future of AI Job Loss and Work: How to Thrive in the Age of AI" by Elon Zakari

In light of the psychological challenges outlined throughout this post, the book Future of AI Job Loss and Work: How to Thrive in the Age of AI offers a timely and insightful exploration of the profound shifts occurring in the workforce due to the rise of artificial intelligence. Written by a renowned expert in the field of labor economics and AI, the book delves into the practical and psychological implications of job loss in the AI era, providing both an in-depth analysis of the changing job market and actionable strategies for workers to adapt and thrive.
The strength of the book lies in its ability to combine empirical research with personal stories, offering a well-rounded perspective on how automation is reshaping industries and individuals alike. Through the lens of various psychological theories, such as Self-Determination Theory and Cognitive Dissonance, the author unpacks how individuals react to the disruption caused by AI. The narrative is rich with case studies that highlight the emotional toll of job displacement, while simultaneously offering optimism through the lens of resilience and adaptability.
One of the most compelling aspects of the book is its focus on practical solutions. It emphasizes the importance of continuous learning, skill development, and the need for workers to foster psychological flexibility in the face of rapid technological change. Additionally, it stresses the role of employers and policymakers in providing the support necessary for workers to transition into new roles and industries, making it a comprehensive resource for anyone looking to navigate the complexities of the AI-driven job market.
Ultimately, Future of AI Job Loss and Work is a crucial read for anyone concerned about the future of work. It serves as a beacon of hope and a guide for individuals looking to not only survive but also thrive in the age of artificial intelligence. Whether you are a worker facing the uncertainty of automation or an employer seeking strategies for workforce adaptation, this book offers valuable insights into how to build a future where both humans and AI can coexist productively.
Ullamcorper primis, nam pretium suspendisse neque

Feature #1

Feature #3

Feature #3
Österreich